Socrates Was Executed Because His Questions Made Authority Uncomfortable
In 399 BCE, in Athens, a jury convicted Socrates and required him to drink poison. Meletus brought the indictment, with the support of Anytus and Lycon. It said that Socrates did not respect the city’s gods, introduced new gods, and corrupted the young. This was not the story of a dictator killing someone by personal order. It was a case taken through the courts of a direct democracy, while Athens was still frightened by defeat, coups, and people who wanted to break the city’s order.
Socrates did not give answers; he exposed the gaps
In 399 BCE, in Athens, a jury convicted Socrates and required him to drink poison. Meletus brought the indictment, with the support of Anytus and Lycon. It said that Socrates did not respect the city’s gods, introduced new gods, and corrupted the young. This was not the story of a dictator killing someone by personal order. It was a case taken through the courts of a direct democracy, while Athens was still frightened by defeat, coups, and people who wanted to break the city’s order.
In 399 BCE, in Athens, a jury convicted Socrates and required him to drink poison. Meletus brought the indictment, with the support of Anytus and Lycon. It said that Socrates did not respect the city’s gods, introduced new gods, and corrupted the young. This was not the story of a dictator killing someone by personal order. It was a case taken through the courts of a direct democracy, while Athens was still frightened by defeat, coups, and people who wanted to break the city’s order.
In 399 BCE, in Athens, a jury convicted Socrates and required him to drink poison. Meletus brought the indictment, with the support of Anytus and Lycon. It said that Socrates did not respect the city’s gods, introduced new gods, and corrupted the young. This was not the story of a dictator killing someone by personal order. It was a case taken through the courts of a direct democracy, while Athens was still frightened by defeat, coups, and people who wanted to break the city’s order.
In 399 BCE, in Athens, a jury convicted Socrates and required him to drink poison. Meletus brought the indictment, with the support of Anytus and Lycon. It said that Socrates did not respect the city’s gods, introduced new gods, and corrupted the young. This was not the story of a dictator killing someone by personal order. It was a case taken through the courts of a direct democracy, while Athens was still frightened by defeat, coups, and people who wanted to break the city’s order.